Concerning the peer review workshop on Reflective Practice (weeks 2 & 3)
I am posting this message also to the Reflective Practice Discussions forum so you can give us feedback.
14 of you have submitted a piece, commented on another participant's' piece, and received comments from yet another participant (and maybe a tutor). Well done! Move on fast to the Virtual conference!
So, technically, it worked for some of you.But there have been numerous queries about the process.
Where it worked,
- Beyond the platform and navigation issues, as an exercise in peer review/enhancement of learning/practice, how was it for you?
Where it didn't work,
- was this technology (i.e. there were no buttons to click)
- OR was it navigation/design/guidance/familiarity with the space?
I accept you may not know where the boundary between these factors lies. I often do not. Any feedback on this experience would be gratefully received. I'll copy this question to the Reflective Practice Discussions forum.